This Judgment Is Fucking Stupid — and Dangerous
Let’s dispense with the lie first: the people being arrested or pepper-sprayed are not “peaceful protesters.” They are rioters and criminal actors engaged in assault, obstruction, and interference with federal law-enforcement operations. Period.
Trying to rebrand criminal conduct as constitutionally protected protest is not civil-rights advocacy — it is active sabotage of federal authority.
ICE and CBP Are Acting Lawfully — Full Stop
ICE and CBP are not rogue militias. They are federal law-enforcement agencies executing federal statutes passed by Congress. Their authority is not optional, conditional, or subject to activist veto.
They are empowered to:
- conduct targeted immigration enforcement
- detain and arrest individuals under federal law
- secure operational perimeters
- use reasonable force to protect agents, evidence, and the public
- prevent interference with active investigations
Nothing about that is unconstitutional. Nothing about that is illegal.
The Constitution does not require federal agents to pause operations because mobs show up screaming slogans, filming faces, or throwing bodily fluids.
Obstruction Is a Crime — Not a Protest
Let’s be absolutely clear about what is happening on the ground:
- Attempting to run down federal agents with vehicles
- Throwing urine, spitting, or bodily fluids
- Physically blocking vehicles, doors, or arrests
- Stalking agents before, during, and after operations
- Swarming, surrounding, or advancing on officers
- Refusing lawful dispersal orders
- Interfering with detainees or evidence
Every one of these acts is criminal. None are protected speech. None are peaceful. None are constitutionally shielded.
You don’t get First Amendment immunity while committing felonies. The Constitution is not a suicide pact, and it is not a riot permit.
Pepper Spray and Arrests Are Lawful Responses to Riot Conduct
Pepper spray is not being used against choir practice and candlelight vigils. It is being used to stop assaults, prevent officer injury, and restore operational control.
Arrests are not arbitrary. They are for:
- obstruction
- assault
- failure to comply with lawful orders
- interference with federal operations
That is exactly what law enforcement is supposed to do.
If a person advances on federal officers, blocks vehicles, throws fluids, or refuses to clear an active enforcement zone, they are no longer a civilian observer — they are a hostile actor.
The “Peaceful Protester” Narrative Is a Lie
This ruling relies on a grotesque fiction: that mobs committing violent, obstructive acts can be relabeled as “peaceful protesters” simply because they chant slogans while doing it.
That lie has been used for years to:
- excuse riots
- paralyze policing
- criminalize self-defense by officers
- turn criminals into martyrs
Courts are supposed to evaluate conduct, not vibes. When they abandon that principle, they stop being arbiters of law and start being political instruments.
A Five-Metre Rule Is Not Radical — It’s Common Sense
During an active federal targeted investigation or enforcement operation, there must be a hard physical exclusion zone.
A minimum five-metre barrier that no civilian may cross under any circumstances is not authoritarian — it is basic operational safety.
No filming in faces.
No crowding vehicles.
No “legal observers” hovering in arrest zones.
No activists testing boundaries until something goes wrong.
Federal agents are not required to negotiate with mobs while executing warrants.
This Judgment Exists for One Reason Only
This ruling is not about civil liberties.
It is not about constitutional clarity.
It is not about lawful protest.
It is about hampering federal enforcement under the Trump administration by:
- raising the legal risk for officers
- emboldening mobs
- creating hesitation in the field
- turning every arrest into a lawsuit
- weaponising courts to do what elections failed to do
This is lawfare, not justice.
The objective is simple: make immigration enforcement so costly, dangerous, and politically radioactive that it becomes impossible to carry out — regardless of what federal law says.
Final Summary — No Bullshit
- ICE and CBP actions are lawful, constitutional, and mandated
- The people being arrested are rioters and obstructors, not peaceful protesters
- Pepper spray and arrests are legitimate responses to criminal conduct
- Courts pretending otherwise are enabling disorder
- This judgment is another attempt to cripple Trump-era enforcement through procedural sabotage
Violence isn’t protest.
Obstruction isn’t speech.
Federal law isn’t optional.
And pretending otherwise is how you get chaos dressed up as constitutional virtue.
Leave a Reply