A REBUTTAL TO AL JAZEERA’S LATEST FEVER DREAM
Al Jazeera has churned out some laughably biased garbage over the years, but this one? This reads like the intern forgot to take their meds before smashing the keyboard in a panic. It’s not journalism. It’s political fan-fiction written for people who still think “Orange Man Bad” passes as critical thought.
Let’s start with the headline:
“Punishable by DEATH: Trump threatens Democrats with sedition charges.”
Oh, bravo. Subtle as a brick through a window. They might as well have added “BREAKING: Democracy Ends Tuesday” for the full melodrama.
1. Their Entire Premise Is a Lie
Here’s what actually happened: A group of Democrat lawmakers — all supposedly seasoned enough to know better — released a political stunt video lecturing the military to defy “illegal orders.” No examples, no specifics, no legal substantiation — just a vague, convenient accusation hanging in the air like a fart nobody wants to own.
They weren’t “reminding troops of their constitutional duty.” Spare me.
They were priming them to ignore the Commander-in-Chief because they don’t like the guy who won the election. That’s not patriotism — that’s a soft coup with a PR team.
Trump pointed out the obvious:
If elected officials are telling the military to disobey civilian leadership on political grounds, that is sedition.
Sedition comes with penalties. This isn’t new. It’s not invented by Trump. It’s not controversial outside of Twitter addicts and terminally online journalists.
But Al Jazeera frames it like Trump just invented capital punishment five minutes ago while twirling a villain moustache.
2. They Pretend Democrats Are Innocent Choir Angels
These are the same people who:
- Spent YEARS calling Trump illegitimate
- Encouraged federal agencies to “resist” him
- Weaponised intel leaks
- Told electors to revolt
- Tried to impeach him for breathing incorrectly
- Accused half the country of being terrorists because they voted the wrong way
And now — NOW — they’re suddenly pearl-clutching about “dangerous rhetoric”?
Congratulations. This is the journalistic equivalent of an arsonist filing a noise complaint about the fire truck sirens.
3. The Article Smuggles Activism in as ‘Context’
Every third sentence is Al Jazeera lovingly caressing Democrat talking points:
- “Illegal military strikes.”
- “Extrajudicial killings.”
- “UN officials warn…”
- “Restricting military law enforcement.”
- “Dangerous rhetoric.”
You can practically hear the writer vibrating with excitement that they get to write anti-Trump fanfic and call it reporting.
They never explain:
- WHAT “illegal order” Trump supposedly gave
- WHY military personnel are being told to pre-emptively mutiny
- HOW six hyper-partisan Democrats magically became the arbiters of constitutional law overnight
- WHERE this sudden concern for the Constitution was during mass censorship, forced mandates, FBI abuses, and all the other civil liberties Democrats torched for fun between 2016–2024
Because they can’t. This entire article depends on the reader being politically illiterate.
4. The Author Treats Democrat Politicians Like Noble Whistleblowers
The video is presented as if it were some solemn message from patriotic guardians.
No.
It was a staged, coordinated, highly edited political operation — and a reckless one — instructing the military to treat the Commander-in-Chief like a criminal before he’s even given an order.
That is NOT “reminding them of their oath.”
That is sedition-marketing with soft lighting.
5. Trump Responds With… Exactly What the Law Says
They frame Trump’s statement like it’s some unhinged threat dripping with fascism.
In reality:
- Sedition is a crime.
- Sedition does carry severe penalties.
- Elected officials are not exempt because they wear blue ties.
If a Republican told soldiers to ignore Biden’s orders, this same journalist would be hyperventilating into a paper bag demanding treason charges by sunrise.
6. Then They Do the Usual: The Parade of Buzzwords
You can make a drinking game out of these articles. They always hit the same notes:
- “Dangerous rhetoric”
- “Threat to democracy”
- “History of threats”
- “International law says…”
- “Experts warn…”
It’s boilerplate activism dressed up to look like reporting. It’s like being lectured by a very earnest pile of cardboard.
7. The Article Is Missing the Only Real Story Here
The real scandal is this:
Sitting members of Congress publicly encouraged the military to ignore the President.
That is wild.
That is reckless.
That is historically unprecedented outside literal coups.
But Al Jazeera won’t touch that with a ten-foot pole, because they’d rather pretend Trump is the villain for pointing out that sedition is, shockingly, illegal.
8. This Is Not Journalism — It’s a Softball for Democrats and a Hit Piece on Trump
If this article were any more biased, it would be wearing a campaign button.
If it were any more melodramatic, it would need a fainting couch.
If it were any more predictable, you could set your watch to its talking points.
Final Verdict
This “article” is just the latest chapter in the long-running genre where partisan activists pretend to be reporters, then clutch their pearls when anyone calls out the obvious.
It’s not news.
It’s not analysis.
It’s narrative laundering wrapped in hysteria and sprinkled with legalese to look serious.
Al Jazeera didn’t publish a report.
They published therapy for people who still haven’t emotionally recovered from losing an election.
And the internet’s had enough of this kind of garbage.
Leave a Reply